[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/includes/session.php on line 2208: Array to string conversion
• View topic - Cyanide, so sell me on this then...

It is currently Thu May 01, 2025 7:50 am


Cyanide, so sell me on this then...

THE DUNGEON : The place to share your game experience.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

slothMD

  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Cyanide, so sell me on this then...

PostWed Apr 25, 2012 6:09 pm

MILLANDSON wrote:Might be worth checking out the actual Q&A thread, since something you're asking had already been answered by Siam, and there are more replies in there.


Yeah, saw the dridges comment - just frustrated at the anti-communication. The same question keeps getting asked over and over and over again - what are the teams - and the same anti-answer keeps getting reflected back - look at this old article from Jervis that doesn't match up to many of the current teams. It's just maddening, especially in the context of a persistent lack of communication. Even "Sorry, we can't give you a list right now because we're still balancing them and working out the kinks" would at least be an answer. Or Ifni forbid a draft list which prospective customers were invited to give feedback on.
Offline
User avatar

Jolly Roger

  • Posts: 312
  • Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: Cyanide, so sell me on this then...

PostWed Apr 25, 2012 6:33 pm

Hi slothMD,
We answered your questions in other threads. We are reading this forum everyday and we really try to be closed to the community now that we are self-published (on this game at least).
So if you want to talk about Blood Bowl communication or simply trolling, this is not the good place here. :)
Offline

slothMD

  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Cyanide, so sell me on this then...

PostWed Apr 25, 2012 6:38 pm

Jolly Roger wrote:Hi slothMD,
We answered your questions in other topics. We are reading this forum everyday and we really try to be closed to the community now that we are self-published (on this game at least).
So if you want to talk about Blood Bowl communication or simply trolling, this is not the good place here. :)


Fantastic - could you kindly point me to the other topic where the question (what are the specific team compositions for the game?) was answered? That would be fantastic - somehow I managed to not notice it, despite checking all 6 active threads. That would be much appreciated, thank you.
Offline

Moraiwe

  • Posts: 17
  • Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:49 pm

Re: Cyanide, so sell me on this then...

PostThu Apr 26, 2012 1:21 am

Honestly slothMD, I don't think they've bothered to make any great departure from GWs outdated dungeonbowl rules. At least I see no indication that they will, and that would be the most interesting thing they could post about. Sadly, it would mean no Lizards, Khemri, Amazons etc. It would be a great dissappointment to me if they didn't include such races, and would be a large determining factor in whether or not I buy this.
Offline
User avatar

jamesfarrell129

  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:37 pm

Re: Cyanide, so sell me on this then...

PostThu Apr 26, 2012 10:02 am

slothMD wrote: ...
1) What are the team structures you support? A simple spreadsheet would answer this, whereas the outdated Dungeonbowl doc does not.


Jolly Roger wrote:Hi slothMD,
We answered your questions in other threads. We are reading this forum everyday and we really try to be closed to the community now that we are self-published (on this game at least).
So if you want to talk about Blood Bowl communication or simply trolling, this is not the good place here. :)


Could you please point us to the answer to this question then?
Offline
User avatar

Jolly Roger

  • Posts: 312
  • Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: Cyanide, so sell me on this then...

PostThu Apr 26, 2012 10:35 am

You can choose any player per race but you have to respect the number max restriction for his position in his race.
There is also a restriction of 2 Loner max in a team.
We wanted it a little bit more flexible than in the Dungeonbowl PDF.
Offline

MILLANDSON

  • Posts: 100
  • Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:55 pm

Re: Cyanide, so sell me on this then...

PostThu Apr 26, 2012 11:46 am

Jolly Roger wrote:You can choose any player per race but you have to respect the number max restriction for his position in his race.
There is also a restriction of 2 Loner max in a team.
We wanted it a little bit more flexible than in the Dungeonbowl PDF.


Jolly, I think they're also asking for all the teams' info - which races are in each team, which races from the CRP are replacing the teams that no longer exist (minotaurs, freeman, etc), stuff like that.

Or will you just be announcing those as you go through the colleges, as you currently are?
Offline
User avatar

Jolly Roger

  • Posts: 312
  • Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: Cyanide, so sell me on this then...

PostThu Apr 26, 2012 2:39 pm

The diffrent teams correpond to the different colleges. So the races available are those contained in the colleges announced.
Offline

slothMD

  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Cyanide, so sell me on this then...

PostThu Apr 26, 2012 3:42 pm

Moraiwe wrote:Honestly slothMD, I don't think they've bothered to make any great departure from GWs outdated dungeonbowl rules.


...which would imply that there are Minotaurs and Freemen, and no Necro or Khemri. We already know that the first part has been denied (and additionally that there will be no Chaos Dwarf), no comment on the second part.
Offline

slothMD

  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Cyanide, so sell me on this then...

PostThu Apr 26, 2012 3:52 pm

Jolly Roger wrote:The diffrent teams correpond to the different colleges. So the races available are those contained in the colleges announced.


OK, so what we have so far is: You can choose any number of players from any race within a particular college up to position maximums, no more than two Loners. (Never mind that this is actually a RADICAL departure from the document that we keep getting linked to when asking any questions about rules)

Now, what we don't have is the cross-reference of which teams match to which colleges. Which college(s) do Necro teams fit in? Khemri? And I'm assuming that you're keeping all the current values in the old Dungeonbowl article (Skaven are in Amethyst and Amber, Norse are in Light and Bright, etc.) - but that's just an assumption until an actual cross-reference list is posted.

Again, you keep telling me that this has been answered on another thread, and telling me I'm trolling for getting frustrated that the question has to keep being asked, but you never seem to point me to where this has actually been answered. Do you begin to understand the frustration? Or am I once again going to get pointed to a document that doesn't answer the question?
PreviousNext

Return to General Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests

cron